Display Consumer-uploaded Images in Reviews Section and Widgets - Google (and Facebook, if possible)
We propose importing the images attached by consumers on Google reviews (and Facebook, if possible). This function should ensure that these consumer-uploaded images are visible within the reviews section of the backoffice, enhancing the richness of the review context. Furthermore these images should also be displayed in the widgets utilized to showcase reviews (example in the attached image). This addition would significantly bolster the credibility of the reviews, making them more engaging and informative for potential customers.
Keywords: review images, review photos, photos uploaded by consumers / reviewers

Log in to comment and vote
Comments7
Sep 14
PinnedDone:
All widgets now support showing images and can be hidden as well.
The reviews page for some time already supports showing images and now all widgets also support this.
Seb Gardies
Jan 6
Problem Statement: The current EMR dashboard does not display photos attached to customer reviews. When a user posts an image alongside their feedback, there is no visual indicator or display within the interface. This creates a critical information gap between the public-facing platforms and the EMR management tool.
Key Arguments for Implementation:
Operational Truth & Verification: A photo is often the only objective evidence in a dispute. For negative reviews (e.g., cleanliness issues, product defects, or incorrect orders), the image allows the manager to verify the claim immediately. Without it, the diagnostic process is incomplete and purely speculative.
Response Relevancy: Replying to a review while ignoring the attached visual content makes the response look automated and disconnected from the customer experience. To maintain high-quality e-reputation standards, the response must address the full context provided by the user (Text + Image).
Centralization Efficiency: The core value of EMR is to centralize management. If a user is forced to leave the dashboard to check the source platform (Google, TripAdvisor, etc.) every time a photo is mentioned, the tool fails its primary objective of productivity.
Immediate Identification of Errors: Photos frequently reveal "wrong-place" reviews (where a customer posts a photo of a different establishment by mistake). Seeing the photo immediately allows the manager to flag the review for removal rather than wasting time investigating a non-existent internal issue.
Functional Requirements:
Visual Indicator: Add a media icon or thumbnail in the main review list to signal the presence of photos.
Integrated Gallery: Enable photo viewing directly within the review detail view, including a lightbox/full-screen toggle for closer inspection.
Metadata Sync: Ensure that API connectors or scrapers are configured to fetch and store media URLs from the source platforms.
Critical Analysis:
The lack of photo integration in EMR is a significant functional blind spot. In modern review management, "the image is the message." By omitting photos, EMR limits the manager's ability to handle high-stakes negative feedback effectively. This feature should be prioritized to ensure the dashboard remains a professional-grade tool rather than a simplified text aggregator.
Seb Gardies
Oct 29, 2025
And even though photos already play a huge role in strengthening the impact of positive reviews, they become absolutely essential when attached to a negative one.
In those cases, the photo often illustrates the actual problem.
And if EMR doesn’t allow us to see it, we might completely miss the point of the review itself.
Seb Gardies
Oct 29, 2025
Most competitors (including simpler ones) already display review photos.
That’s actually the main reason why, for most of my clients, I currently use a different solution instead of EMR, simply because it supports photo reviews (of course, I’d much rather use EMR only and drop the other tools entirely).
Seb Gardies
Oct 29, 2025
In 2025, when everything online is becoming more visual and interactive, it’s hard to imagine a review system without photos.
And it’s not just my opinion, it’s Google’s logic :
Check any Google Business Profile, no matter the industry: it’s always the photo reviews that show up first and get the most visibility.
Having photos in reviews has become a best practice for multiple reasons:
✅ Reviews with photos look far more authentic and verified, making fake reviews easy to spot. According to Whitespark, reviews with photos are perceived as 37 % more trustworthy than text-only reviews.
✅ They carry more weight in Google’s algorithm, helping listings rank higher.
✅ They’re featured in the “Most relevant” tab on Google — which means they get way more visibility than text-only reviews.
Seb Gardies
Oct 29, 2025
Right now, EMR doesn’t handle photos attached to Google reviews. They don’t appear in the Reviews tab or in widgets.
That’s a huge missed opportunity.
Photos are often the most powerful part of a review because they build trust, show real experiences, and make a business stand out on Google.
Think about it:
For industries like furniture, crafts, tourism, hospitality, or food, photos make all the difference. They act like a visual portfolio built by customers themselves, authentic UGC that boosts credibility and drives conversions.
Here’s the vision:
📸 Display review photos directly inside the Reviews tab
🧩 Include them in widgets so websites can showcase real visuals from happy clients
🤖 Go even further by letting EMR detect when a review includes a photo, and use that info in the AI reply prompt
For example, if a client leaves a 5-star review without a photo, the AI could automatically add a friendly suggestion like:
This would add massive visual and marketing value to EMR, turning customer reviews into a living gallery of real experiences.
Severi
Jan 22, 2025
There must be an option to disable specific images from showing in widgets, even if the images are loaded into EMR